Proportionality analysis and models of judicial review B Pirker | 67 | 2012 |
Deporting the Citizens within the European Union: A Counter-Intuitive Trend in Case C-348/09, PI V Oberburgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid D Kochenov, B Pirker Colum. J. Eur. L. 19, 369, 2012 | 46* | 2012 |
Territorial Sovereignty and Integrity and the Challenges of Cyberspace B Pirker The Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace-International Law …, 2013 | 41 | 2013 |
Zur Parallelität der Rechtsentwicklung in der EU und in der Schweiz A Epiney, B Metz, B Pirker Ein Beitrag zur rechtlichen Tragweite der „Bilateralen Abkommen “, Zürich, 2012 | 22 | 2012 |
Making Interpretation More Explicit: International Law and Pragmatics B Pirker, J Smolka Nordic Journal of International Law 86 (2), 228-266, 2017 | 21 | 2017 |
International Law and Pragmatics-An Account of Interpretation in International Law J Smolka, B Pirker JLL 5, 1, 2016 | 20 | 2016 |
The early case law of the Eurasian Economic Union Court: On the road to Luxembourg? K Entin, B Pirker Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 25 (3), 266-287, 2018 | 19 | 2018 |
Aarhus-Konvention: Handkommentar A Epiney, S Diezig, B Pirker, S Reitemeyer (No Title), 2018 | 19 | 2018 |
The future of international law is cognitive—International law, cognitive sociology and cognitive pragmatics B Pirker, J Smolka German Law Journal 20 (4), 430-448, 2019 | 18 | 2019 |
Bosman’s Second Life? The Eurasian Economic Union Court and the Free Movement of Professional Athletes B Pirker, K Entin Legal issues of economic integration 46 (2), 2019 | 14 | 2019 |
The Free Movement of Persons in the Eurasian Economic Union–between Civis Eurasiaticus and Homo Oeconomicus B Pirker, K Entin European citizenship under stress, 508-532, 2020 | 10 | 2020 |
Pragmatic inferences and moral factors in treaty interpretation—Applying experimental linguistics to international law B Pirker, I Skoczeń German Law Journal 23 (3), 314-332, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
Grundrechtsschutz im Unionsrecht zwischen Subsidiarität und Integration B Pirker Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018 | 9 | 2018 |
Between discursive and exclusive autonomy–opinion 2/13, the protection of fundamental rights and the autonomy of EU law BH Pirker, S Reitemeyer Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 17, 168-188, 2015 | 9 | 2015 |
Zur Parallelität der Rechtsentwicklung in der EU und in der Schweiz: ein Beitrag zur rechtlichen Tragweite der" Bilateralen Abkommen" A Epiney, B Metz, B Pirker, B Metz Schulthess, 2012 | 9 | 2012 |
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters and the Aarhus Convention's Effects in the EU Legal Order: No Room for Nuanced Self‐executing Effect? B Pirker Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 25 (1), 81-91, 2016 | 8 | 2016 |
Opinion 2/13 of the court of justice on access of the EU to the ECHR–one step ahead and two steps back S Reitemeyer, B Pirker European law blog 31, 2015 | 8 | 2015 |
International law and linguistics: Pieces of an interdisciplinary puzzle B Pirker, J Smolka Journal of International Dispute Settlement 11 (4), 501-521, 2020 | 7 | 2020 |
International law, pragmatics and the distinction between conceptual and procedural meaning J Smolka, B Pirker Pragmatics and the Distinction Between Conceptual and Procedural Meaning …, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
Proportionality analysis and international commercial arbitration–the example of public policy and domestic courts B Pirker Establishing Judicial Authority in International Economic Law, 290-319, 2016 | 7 | 2016 |