| The purpose of senatorial grandstanding during Supreme court confirmation hearings JA Schoenherr, EA Lane, MT Armaly Journal of Law and Courts 8 (2), 333-358, 2020 | 16 | 2020 |
| Friends with benefits: Case significance, amicus curiae, and agenda setting on the us supreme court JA Schoenherr, RC Black International Review of Law and Economics 58, 43-53, 2019 | 13 | 2019 |
| Black. 2019.“The Use of Precedent in US Supreme Court Litigant Briefs.” JA Schoenherr, C Ryan Elgar Research Handbook on Judicial Process, ed. Susan Sterrett and Lee …, 0 | 7 | |
| Confessions at the Supreme court: Judicial response to solicitor general error JA Schoenherr, NW Waterbury Journal of Law and Courts 10 (1), 13-36, 2022 | 6 | 2022 |
| The use of precedent in US Supreme Court litigant briefs JA Schoenherr, RC Black Research Handbook on Law and Courts, 114-129, 2019 | 3 | 2019 |
| A matter of opinion? How unexpected opinion authors influence support for Supreme Court decisions JM King, JA Schoenherr Journal of Law and Courts 12 (1), 144-164, 2024 | 2 | 2024 |
| “A Matter of Great Importance”: Interest Groups, the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings EA Lane, JA Schoenherr | 2 | 2019 |
| Call and Response: Legal Entrepreneurship and Attorney Success at the US Supreme Court JA Schoenherr | 2 | |
| Did you hear about Clarence Thomas? Measuring public attention toward the Supreme Court CN Krewson, JA Schoenherr, M Shieh Research & Politics 11 (2), 20531680241263709, 2024 | 1 | 2024 |
| Anchoring or Expanding? Gender and Judicial Nomination JM King, I Ostrander, JA Schoenherr | 1 | 2024 |
| Hidden Successes: Briefs, Oral Arguments, and Gender Roles at the US Supreme Court EA Lane, JA Schoenherr | 1 | 2024 |
| Attorneys, Merits Briefs, and US Supreme Court Decision Making JA Schoenherr Michigan State University, 2020 | 1 | 2020 |
| Friendship is Rare: The Influence of Off-Bench Friendships on Support for the US Supreme Court MT Armaly, JA Schoenherr American Politics Research, 1532673X241263080, 2024 | | 2024 |
| Supplemental Appendix: Confessions at the Supreme Court: Judicial Response to Solicitor General Error JA Schoenherr, NW Waterbury | | 2022 |
| The Rights Paradox: How Group Attitudes Shape US Supreme Court Legitimacy JA Schoenherr Political Science Quarterly 137 (3), 605-607, 2022 | | 2022 |
| 2.3 Judicial Discretion and US Supreme Court Agenda Setting EA Lane, JA Schoenherr, RA Schutte, RC Black Open Judicial Politics, 2020 | | 2020 |
| Supplemental Appendix for “Did You Hear about Clarence Thomas? Measuring Public Attention toward the Supreme Court” CN Krewson, JA Schoenherr, M Shieh | | |
| Supplemental Appendix for “You Better Shop Around: Litigant Characteristics and Supreme Court Support” JS Scott, EA Lane, JA Schoenherr | | |
| You Better Shop Around: Litigant Characteristics and Supreme Court Support JS Scott, EA Lane, JA Schoenherr | | |
| Breaking the Legal Stalemate: How Membership Changes Shift Stakeholder Strategies at the US Supreme Court CA Drolc, AH Merrill, JA Schoenherr | | |
Elizabeth A. LaneAssistant Professor, Department of Political Science, North Carolina State UniversityVerified email at ncsu.edu
