| Mixed Method Lessons Learned from 80 years of Q methodology S Ramlo Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2015 | 271 | 2015 |
| Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis in mixed methods research I Newman, S Ramlo Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 2, 505-530, 2010 | 224 | 2010 |
| Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum S Ramlo, I Newman Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal for Q Methodology 34 (3 …, 2011 | 202 | 2011 |
| The coronavirus and higher education: Faculty viewpoints about universities moving online during a worldwide pandemic S Ramlo Innovative higher education 46 (3), 241-259, 2021 | 83 | 2021 |
| Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation S Ramlo American Journal of Physics 76 (9), 882-886, 2008 | 80 | 2008 |
| Centroid and theoretical rotation: Justification for their use in Q methodology research S Ramlo Mid-Western Educational Researcher 28 (1), 5, 2016 | 75 | 2016 |
| Theoretical significance in Q methodology: A qualitative approach to a mixed method. S Ramlo Research in the Schools 22 (1), 2015 | 74 | 2015 |
| Divergent viewpoints about the statistical stage of a mixed method: qualitative versus quantitative orientations SE Ramlo International Journal of Research & Method in Education 43 (1), 93-111, 2020 | 54 | 2020 |
| STEM high school teachers’ views of implementing PBL: An investigation using anecdote circles AL deChambeau, SE Ramlo Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 11 (1), 7, 2017 | 51 | 2017 |
| Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters’ divergent points of view A Gingerich, SE Ramlo, CPM van der Vleuten, KW Eva, G Regehr Advances in Health Sciences Education 22, 819-838, 2017 | 48 | 2017 |
| Using Word Clouds to Present Q Methodology Data and Findings S Ramlo Human Subjectivity 9 (2), 99-111, 2011 | 47* | 2011 |
| Determining the various perspectives and consensus within a classroom using Q methodology SE Ramlo AIP Conference Proceedings 1064 (1), 179-182, 2008 | 45 | 2008 |
| Evaluating an inquiry-based bioinformatics course using Q methodology SE Ramlo, D McConnell, ZH Duan, FB Moore Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 219-225, 2008 | 45 | 2008 |
| Student perspectives on learning physics and their relationship with learning force and motion concepts: A study using Q methodology S Ramlo Human Subjectivity 2 (1), 73-90, 2008 | 34 | 2008 |
| Classifying individuals using Q methodology and Q factor analysis: Applications of two mixed methodologies for program evaluation S Ramlo, I Newman Journal of Research in Education 21 (2), 20-31, 2010 | 32 | 2010 |
| COVID-19 response: Student views about emergency remote instruction S Ramlo College Teaching 70 (1), 65-73, 2022 | 28 | 2022 |
| Q methodology as a tool for program assessment SE Ramlo Mid-Western Educational Researcher 27 (3), 3, 2015 | 28 | 2015 |
| Students’ views about potentially offering physics courses online SE Ramlo Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 489-496, 2016 | 27 | 2016 |
| Student views about a flipped physics course: A tool for program evaluation and improvement S Ramlo Research in the Schools 22 (1), 44, 2015 | 27 | 2015 |
| Inservice science teachers' views of a professional development workshop and their learning of force and motion concepts S Ramlo Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (7), 928-935, 2012 | 27 | 2012 |
Aimee deChambeauThe University of AkronVerified email at uakron.edu
