Eve M. Ringsmuth
Cited by
Cited by
Voting fluidity and oral argument on the US Supreme Court
EM Ringsmuth, AC Bryan, TR Johnson
Political research quarterly 66 (2), 429-440, 2013
Hear Me Roar: What Provokes Supreme Court Justices to Dissent from the Bench
TR Johnson, RC Black, EM Ringsmuth
Minn. L. Rev. 93, 1560, 2008
The role of emotional language in briefs before the US Supreme Court
RC Black, MEK Hall, RJ Owens, EM Ringsmuth
Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2), 377-407, 2016
The American public and the room to maneuver: Responsibility attributions and policy efficacy in an era of globalization
TT Hellwig, EM Ringsmuth, JR Freeman
International Studies Quarterly 52 (4), 855-880, 2008
Jeremiad or weapon of words?: the power of emotive language in Supreme Court dissents
AC Bryan, EM Ringsmuth
Journal of Law and Courts 4 (1), 159-185, 2016
Oral Argument in the Time of COVID: The Chief Plays Calvinball
T Jacobi, TR Johnson, EM Ringsmuth, M Sag
S. Cal. Interdisc. LJ 30, 399, 2020
Supreme Court oral arguments and institutional maintenance
EM Ringsmuth, TR Johnson
American politics research 41 (4), 651-673, 2013
Strict Scrutiny
L Dancey, KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth
Judicature 95, 126, 2011
Departures from the court: The political landscape and institutional constraints
KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth
American Politics Research 37 (3), 486-507, 2009
It's not personal: politics and policy in lower court confirmation hearings
L Dancey, KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth
University of Michigan Press, 2020
Pushing constitutional limits in the US States: Legislative professionalism and judicial review of state laws by the US Supreme Court
SM Miller, EM Ringsmuth, JM Little
State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (4), 476-491, 2015
Voting fluidity throughout the decision-making process on the US Supreme Court
EM Ringsmuth
Justice System Journal 36 (3), 197-211, 2015
Individual Scrutiny or Politics as Usual? Senatorial Assessment of US District Court Nominees
L Dancey, KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth
American Politics Research 42 (5), 784-814, 2014
SCOTUS in the time of COVID: The evolution of justice dynamics during Oral arguments
EM Ringsmuth, M Sag, TR Johnson, T Jacobi
Law & Policy 45 (1), 66-80, 2023
Asked and Answered: The Senate Judiciary Committee and Judicial Confirmation Hearings
L Dancey, K Nelson, E Ringsmuth
APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, 2012
Scotus and Covid: How the Media Reacted to the Livestreaming of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
R Houston, TR Johnson, EM Ringsmuth
Rowman & Littlefield, 2023
The Impact of Course Structure on Students’ Political Efficacy and Confidence-in-Knowledge in Introduction to American Government
JM Jansa, EM Ringsmuth
Journal of Political Science Education 18 (4), 455-475, 2022
Invoking Precedent: Discussion of Supreme Court Decisions at Circuit Court Confirmation Hearings
L Dancey, K Nelson, EM Ringsmuth, E Solomon
American Politics Research 48 (3), 355-364, 2020
Inter-Institutional Dynamics: Assessments of the Supreme Court in a Separation of Powers Context
KR Nelson, EM Ringsmuth
Political Behavior 35, 357-382, 2013
Institutional rules and decision making on the US Supreme Court
EM Ringsmuth
University of Minnesota, 2009
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20