| Voting fluidity and oral argument on the US Supreme Court EM Ringsmuth, AC Bryan, TR Johnson Political research quarterly 66 (2), 429-440, 2013 | 67 | 2013 |
| Jeremiad or weapon of words?: the power of emotive language in Supreme Court dissents AC Bryan, EM Ringsmuth Journal of Law and Courts 4 (1), 159-185, 2016 | 51 | 2016 |
| Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the US Supreme Court AC Bryan, CD Kromphardt Justice System Journal 37 (4), 298-317, 2016 | 41 | 2016 |
| Revisiting the influence of Law Clerks on the US Supreme Court's agenda-setting process RC Black, CL Boyd, AC Bryan Marq. L. Rev. 98, 75, 2014 | 38 | 2014 |
| Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts: An Empirical Examination of Selection and Retention Methods RJ Owens, A Tahk, PC Wohlfarth, AC Bryan State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15 (2), 211-238, 2015 | 24 | 2015 |
| Judging the “vapid and hollow charade”: Citizen evaluations and the candor of US Supreme Court nominees PG Chen, AC Bryan Political Behavior 40, 495-520, 2018 | 20 | 2018 |
| The public’s foreign aid priorities: evidence from a conjoint experiment D Doherty, AC Bryan, D Hanania, M Pajor American Politics Research 48 (5), 635-648, 2020 | 18 | 2020 |
| Public opinion and setting the agenda on the US Supreme court AC Bryan American Politics Research 48 (3), 377-390, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| The Policy Consequences of Term Limits on the US Supreme Court RC Black, AC Bryan Ohio NUL Rev. 42, 821, 2015 | 9 | 2015 |
| Representation imperatives in the public mind D Doherty, AC Bryan, R Willis, P Witry Social Science Quarterly 100 (6), 1963-1983, 2019 | 8 | 2019 |
| How Supreme Court justices supervise ideologically distant states AC Bryan, RJ Owens American Politics Research 45 (3), 435-456, 2017 | 7 | 2017 |
| Principled Agents or Legal Rasputins? Influence, Ideology, and the Cert. Pool on the US Supreme Court AC Bryan Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, 2012 | 7 | 2012 |
| An actor-based measure of issue salience: Information acquisition and the case of the United States Supreme Court RC Black, AC Bryan, TR Johnson Issue Salience in International Politics, 241-257, 2011 | 7 | 2011 |
| The legal double standard: Gender, personality information, and the evaluation of supreme court nominees P Chen, A Bryan Justice System Journal 42 (3-4), 325-340, 2021 | 6 | 2021 |
| Taking Note: Justice Harry A. Blackmun's Observations from Oral Argument about Life, the Law and the US Supreme Court AC Bryan, R Houston, TR Johnson J. Sup. Ct. Hist. 45, 44, 2020 | 5 | 2020 |
| Explaining the (non) occurrence of equal divisions on the US Supreme Court RC Black, AC Bryan American politics research 42 (6), 1077-1095, 2014 | 5 | 2014 |
| Calling in the reserves: Judicial replacements on the US Supreme Court RC Black, AC Bryan Justice System Journal 35 (1), 4-26, 2014 | 3 | 2014 |
| Vox Populi, Vox Curiae: Public Opinion and the US Supreme Court AC Bryan University of Minnesota, 2014 | 3 | 2014 |
| Loyalty and Deference at Oral Arguments: An Empirical Examination of How Supreme Court Justices Treat Solicitors General AC Bryan, C Gregory, TR Johnson Loy. U. Chi. LJ 48, 439, 2016 | 1 | 2016 |
| The Policy Consequences of Term Limits on the US SupremeCourt R Black, A Bryan Ohio Northern University Law Review 42 (3), 6, 2023 | | 2023 |
Timothy R. JohnsonHorace T. Morse Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Law, University of MinnesotaVerified email at umn.edu
