Suivre
Florian Pargent
Florian Pargent
Psychological Methods and Assessment, LMU Munich
Adresse e-mail validée de psy.lmu.de - Page d'accueil
Titre
Citée par
Citée par
Année
Personality research and assessment in the era of machine learning
C Stachl, F Pargent, S Hilbert, GM Harari, R Schoedel, S Vaid, SD Gosling, ...
European Journal of Personality 34 (5), 613-631, 2020
692020
Cognitive reserve in young and old healthy subjects: differences and similarities in a testing-the-limits paradigm with DSST
J Zihl, T Fink, F Pargent, M Ziegler, M Bühner
Plos one 9 (1), e84590, 2014
402014
To challenge the morning lark and the night owl: Using smartphone sensing data to investigate day–night behaviour patterns
R Schoedel, F Pargent, Q Au, ST Völkel, T Schuwerk, M Bühner, C Stachl
European Journal of Personality 34 (5), 733-752, 2020
242020
Regularized target encoding outperforms traditional methods in supervised machine learning with high cardinality features
F Pargent, F Pfisterer, J Thomas, B Bischl
Computational Statistics, 1-22, 2022
17*2022
Predictive modeling with psychological panel data
F Pargent, J Albert-von der Gönna
Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 2019
112019
Can’t make it better nor worse
F Pargent, S Hilbert, K Eichhorn, M Bühner
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2018
82018
Not very powerful
D Goretzko, F Pargent, LNN Sust, M Bühner
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2019
42019
Cognitive reserve in the healthy elderly: cognitive and psychological factors
Z Josef, N Sousa, K Walther, T Fink, A Schmid, OFX Almeida
ScienceOpen Research, 2015
32015
Everything has its price: Foundations of cost-sensitive learning and its application in psychology
P Sterner, D Goretzko, F Pargent
PsyArXiv, 2021
22021
Prediction of Health-Related Outcomes and Turnover Intention with the Munich Employee Health Questionnaire (MEHQ)
BM Zweck, F Pargent, M Bühner
PsyArXiv, 2019
22019
Detection, avoidance, and compensation-three studies on extreme response style
F Pargent
LMU Munich, 2017
22017
What’s the measure? An empirical investigation of self-ratings on response scales
S Hilbert, F Pargent, E Kraus, F Naumann, K Eichhorn, P Ungar, ...
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 25 (1), 59-78, 2022
12022
Investigating target ballistic characteristics of conventional and alternative shotgun ammunition for the applicability in hunting.
J Fäth, D Goretzko, F Pargent, M Gessinger, W Pfeiffer, L Brack, T Liu, ...
Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung 189 (9/10), 161-172, 2018
12018
The confidence/significance level implies a certain cost ratio between type I error and type II error: For a stronger focus on decision theory in psychological assessment-Das …
P Sterner, B Friemelt, D Goretzko, EB Kraus, M Bühner, F Pargent
PsyArXiv, 2022
2022
New Insights into PCA+ Varimax for Psychological Researchers: A short commentary on Rohe & Zeng (2022)
F Pargent, D Goretzko, T von Oertzen
PsyArXiv, 2022
2022
Evaluation of the German Version of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 as a Screening Tool for Adult Attention-Deficit …
C Ballmann, MA Kölle, I Bekavac-Günther, F Wolf, F Pargent, A Barzel, ...
Frontiers in psychology 13, 858147-858147, 2022
2022
An Introduction to Machine Learning for Psychologists in R
F Pargent, R Schoedel, C Stachl
PsyArXiv, 2022
2022
Machine Learning and Risk Assessment: Random Forest Does Not Outperform Logistic Regression in the Prediction of Sexual Recidivism
S Etzler, F Schönbrodt, F Pargent, R Eher, M Rettenberger
PsyArXiv, 2022
2022
Aging and the rehabilitation of homonymous hemianopia: The efficacy of compensatory eye-movement training techniques and a five-year follow up
J Zihl, RW Kentridge, F Pargent, CA Heywood
Aging Brain 1, 100012, 2021
2021
The 95%-CI decision rule in psychological assessment from a decision theoretic perspective
F Pargent, D Goretzko, B Friemelt
2019
Le système ne peut pas réaliser cette opération maintenant. Veuillez réessayer plus tard.
Articles 1–20