Legal blame: How jurors think and talk about accidents. N Feigenson American Psychological Association, 2000 | 242 | 2000 |
Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: A research review N Feigenson, J Park Law and Human Behavior 30, 143-161, 2006 | 229 | 2006 |
Sympathy and legal judgment: A psychological anaylsis NR Feigenson Tenn. L. Rev. 65, 1, 1997 | 173 | 1997 |
Law in the digital age: How visual communication technologies are transforming the practice, theory, and teaching of law RK Sherwin, N Feigenson, C Spiesel BuJ sCi. & TeCh. L. 12, 227, 2006 | 153 | 2006 |
Law on display: The digital transformation of legal persuasion and judgment N Feigenson, C Spiesel NYU Press, 2009 | 147 | 2009 |
Effect of blameworthiness and outcome severity on attributions of responsibility and damage awards in comparative negligence cases N Feigenson, J Park, P Salovey Law and Human Behavior 21, 597-617, 1997 | 144 | 1997 |
Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: On the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI N Feigenson International Journal of Law in Context 2 (3), 233-255, 2006 | 135 | 2006 |
The rhetoric of torts: How advocates help jurors think about causation, reasonableness, and responsibility NR Feigenson Hastings LJ 47, 61, 1995 | 94 | 1995 |
So you're sorry? The role of remorse in criminal law R Zhong, M Baranoski, N Feigenson, L Davidson, A Buchanan, H Zonana Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 42, 39-48, 2014 | 80 | 2014 |
Virtual trials: Necessity, invention, and the evolution of the courtroom SA Bandes, N Feigenson Buff. L. Rev. 68, 1275, 2020 | 69 | 2020 |
New visual technologies in court: Directions for research N Feigenson, MA Dunn Law and Human Behavior 27, 109-126, 2003 | 69 | 2003 |
The Role of Emotions in Comparative Negligence Judgments1 N Feigenson, J Park, P Salovey Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (3), 576-603, 2001 | 68 | 2001 |
Emotions, risk perceptions and blaming in 9/11 cases NR Feigenson Brook. L. Rev. 68, 959, 2002 | 67 | 2002 |
Jurors’ emotions and judgments of legal responsibility and blame: What does the experimental research tell us? N Feigenson Emotion Review 8 (1), 26-31, 2016 | 66 | 2016 |
The jury persuaded (and not): Computer animation in the courtroom MA Dunn, P Salovey, N Feigenson Law & Policy 28 (2), 228-248, 2006 | 66 | 2006 |
Visual evidence N Feigenson Psychonomic bulletin & review 17, 149-154, 2010 | 61 | 2010 |
In the eyes of the law: Perception versus reality in appraisals of video evidence. Y Granot, E Balcetis, N Feigenson, T Tyler Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 24 (1), 93, 2018 | 59 | 2018 |
The visual in law: Some problems for legal theory N Feigenson Law, Culture and the Humanities 10 (1), 13-23, 2014 | 54 | 2014 |
Perceptions of terrorism and disease risks: A cross-national comparison N Feigenson, D Bailis, W Klein Mo. L. REv. 69, 991, 2004 | 43 | 2004 |
Political Standing and Governmental Endorsement of Religion: An Alternative to Current Establishment Clause Doctrine NR Feigenson DePaul L. Rev. 40, 53, 1990 | 43 | 1990 |